Right now, to incorporate new discoveries in science each day, perhaps with an eye towards responses and implications.
To 2011, I said this is where I keep pastiches: fiction written along with friends, friends' characters, fiction with original plots dealing with trademarked properties (as demos, if you will.) My other site is purely original content...http://ceaseill.blogspot.com
Marc Kane points out Elena hasn’t turned off all emotions---just “good ones”! Violence and anger still work with her vampire nature---just no conscience. What do you think? Storywise she was less interesting, she says, for only being defined by her men and those who died. Elena the victim’s becoming the villain, and the villain always moves the story. Do you think what is left is a pissed-off drive for revenge? (It’s a bit like Satanism: still a response to another system, even while attempting to assert independence.) After all, why, do you think, is she motivated to prove anything to Damon and Stefan? She doesn’t have to take the cure, really---it would not remove what she’s been through, like losing her last family member. So what does killing the waitress---or anyone---prove? The thrill of the story continues---but what sort of life is Elena motivated to have now?
Also, she is more like Damon was, when he first appeared---how do you think he has been changed by her love? Do you think he’s better now, developed and changed? No one has a chance to love her now as she is. Does it seem Damon was close to accepting her as she was, taking the chance she might love him? We think he would rather lose her to his brother than to a lack of remorse or feeling. Is that his insight? We think it remains to be seen, what light her love may have shed into his inner life. Do you think emotions are necessary to make decisions? Without emotions, she can only make calculated moves (revenge for the ways she’s been changed?).